Born in Cluj-Napoca, Transylvania (Romania), Dr. Ioan-Sebastian Buhai is an academic economist with main expertise in Microeconometrics, Labour Economics, Empirical Industrial Organization, and Applied Microeconomics more generally. He holds PhD and MPhil degrees in Economics from the Tinbergen Institute and Erasmus University Rotterdam, and simultaneous BSc in Sciences (Mathematics/ Theoretical Physics) and BA in Social Sciences (Economics/ Law/ Political Sciences) degrees from University College Utrecht, Utrecht University. He has an unusually international career, with current principal affiliations at the Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI) of Stockholm University, the Centre for Research in Economics and Management (NIPE) at University of Minho, and the Center for Economics Research and its Applications (CEPREMAP) in Paris, and previous long-term or shorter/ visiting positions at other top universities and research institutes, inter alia Einaudi Institute for Economics of Finance, Northwestern University, Chicago Fed, Aarhus University, VU University Amsterdam, or University College London. Dr. Buhai’s research has been published in leading scientific journals—among others counting Econometrica and the Journal of Business and Economic Statistics—and has been awarded prestigious grants and fellowships totaling close to 500,000 euro—including a 3-year Marie Curie IOF for career development at Northwestern University and Aarhus University, with Nobel Laureate Dale Mortensen as mentor. He has taught various courses linked to his research interests, at both graduate and undergraduate levels, in several institutions/ countries. Sebastian Buhai has also been acting in the capacity of independent expert for a series of public and private institutions, including for evaluating research or policy proposals at various national and international levels. Last but not least, Dr. Buhai has been a keen observer and fierce critic of his country of birth’s science, education, and socio-economic policies for over two decades now, inter alia contributing frequent essays, interviews, and other forms of dissemination for wider audiences—in the Romanian mainstream media.

Ego: academic, economist, bon vivant—most eclectically. Alter ego.
More: scan my website, follow me on twitter, flip through my blog.

Consult my shorter research bio/ profile on the IZA Bonn’s website.

If you read Romanian: consultaţi o scurtă autobiografie în română.
If you also speak it: spre excelenţă in ştiinţe—mai ales—economice.
If you bewail Romania’s wasting its boon: economie, caut strategie!
Recent live TV: războiul din Ucraina/ joburi de viitor/ salarii minime.
Recent live lecture: Economia — între știință, artă și politici publice.
Recent MSM interviews: sancțiuni economice eficiente contra Rusiei.

Romania 2021, socio-economically: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
If you are—or sympathize with—Romanian economists: read & rise!

Pics with: my precious; my better half; more top econs; a super econ.

Maps of the cities in which I lived so far and countries that I visited.

“Publish AND perish” is really not healthier than “publish OR perish”.

Nota bene: I do not use (never used; no plans to use) Facebook (Meta).

Sebastian (I.S.) Buhai, PhD: Brief résumé with links (March 2024)
For a detailed Curriculum Vitae please download the extended PDF version.

Current/ Recent Academic Affiliations

Since 11/2014, I have been Associated Researcher at the Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University. As of 09/2018, I have also been Visiting Researcher at the Center for Economic Research and its Applications (CEPREMAP) in Paris, as well as, since 11/2018, Visiting Researcher (in residence for periodic 1 to 2 weeks) at the Microdata Research Laboratory (BPLim) of Banco de Portugal in Porto. I moreover have a long-term affiliation with the research center NIPE at the University of Minho in Braga, as well as ongoing scientific appointments at a few other institutions such as, e.g., IZA Bonn.

From 10/2017 to 09/2018, I was also Advanced Fellow of the STAR-UBB Institute, Babes-Bolyai University in Cluj-Napoca. Between 01/2015 and 04/2015, I was Visiting Professor at the Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance (EIEF) in Rome. From 05/2013 to 10/2014, I was Visiting Faculty at the Department of Economics, Stockholm University. Between 05/2010-05/2013, I was Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellow (IOF) at the Department of Economics, Northwestern University & Department of Economics and Business, Aarhus University. It was an honor to have Dale Mortensen mentor during my IOF—and beyond.

Main Research Interests

Microeconometrics, Labor Economics, Empirical IO, Applied Microeconomics, Real Options, Social Networks

Degree Education

• 2008 (November): Ph.D. in Economics, Tinbergen Institute/ Erasmus University Rotterdam
• 2003: M.Phil. in Economics, Tinbergen Institute
• 2001: B.Sc. in Sciences (Mathematics/ Theoretical Physics), University College Utrecht/ Utrecht University
• 2001: B.A. in Social Sciences (Economics/ Law/ Political Sciences), Univ. College Utrecht/ Utrecht University

Published and Other Completed Research

* I maintain a much more detailed page about my Economics research including, inter alia, titles/ synopses of my work in progress.

Peer-reviewed academic journal publications of original research:

• Returns to Tenure or Seniority? (with Miguel Portela, Coen Teulings & Aico van Vuuren), March 2014, Econometrica, 82 (2), pages 705–730, DOI: 10.3982/ECTA8688 . See also the corresponding Web Appendix or the older July 2009 version (includes theory framework)
• Tenure Profiles and Efficient Separation in a Stochastic Productivity Model (with Coen Teulings), May 2014, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 32:2, pages 245-258, DOI:10.1080/07350015.2013.866568. See also the corresponding Web Appendix or the accepted, non-gated, November 2013 version
• How Productive is Workplace Health and Safety? (with Elena Cottini & Niels Westergaard-Nielsen), Oct 2017, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 119(4), pages 1086-1104, DOI:10.1111/sjoe.12184. See also the corresponding Online Appendix or the non-gated, December 2015 version
• A Social Network Analysis of Occupational Segregation (with Marco van der Leij), Feb 2023, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 147, 104593, DOI:10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104593. See also the accepted, non-gated Dec 2022 version.
  

Selected unpublished research, in downloadable working paper format:

• Firm Downsizing, Public Policy, and the Age Structure of Employment Adjustments (with Hans-Martin von Gaudecker), current stage: being revised
  

Books, monographs, and research review articles:

• Buhai, I.S. (2008), “Essays on Labour Markets: Worker-Firm Dynamics, Occupational Segregation and Workplace Conditions” (digital version also accessible via the EUR online repository), PhD Thesis November 2008, Tinbergen Institute and Erasmus University Rotterdam, published as book at Thela Thesis -Academic Publishing Services, ISBN 978-90-5170-921-6, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
• Buhai, I.S. (2006), “Wages, Seniority and Separation Rates in a Stochastic Productivity Model: A Comparative Perspective“, M.Phil. Thesis May 2003, Tinbergen Institute and Erasmus University Rotterdam, published in 2006 as monograph at Editura Stiintifica “Lumen” (“Lumen” Scientific Publishing House), ISBN-10 973-7766-51-2, Iasi, Romania
• Buhai, I.S. (2005), “Quantile Regression: Overview and Selected Applications“, Ad-Astra Journal (Young Romanian Scientists’ Journal), Vol. 4
• Buhai, I.S. (2003), “Note on Panel Data Econometrics”, Netherlands Network of Economics (NAKE)’s “Nieuws”, Vol. 15 (2)

Selected academic contributions tangential to/ in other fields than Economics:

• Scientometrics/ Science Policy: Buhai, I.S., G.C. Silaghi, F.O. Bilbiie, A.G. Halunga, C.M. Litan, V. Midrigan, C. Pop-Eleches, Z. Sandor, M.C. Voia (2016), “The Rise for Academic Integrity in Romanian (Domestic) Economic Sciences“, DOI:10.5281/zenodo.1322737, scientific report/ manifesto concerning the state of the Economics research inside Romania
  
• Science Policy: Buhai, I.S., C.M. Litan and G.C. Silaghi (2015), “Demotivarea performantei: cazul criteriilor nationale de evaluare a cercetarii in Stiintele Economice din Romania” (translated title: “Disincentivizing the performance: the case of the Romanian national criteria for evaluating research in Economic Sciences”; you can also download an abstract in English or presentation slides in English), chapter in the 2015 Report of the Romanian Think Tank “Grupul de Analiza, Atitudine si Actiune in Politica Stiintei din Romania” (Raport 2015 – TT-G3A), Journal of Science Policy and Scientometrics/ Revista de Politica Stiintei si Scientometrie-Serie Noua, Vol 4(4)/Dec 2015, pp. 250-287, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1322726
• International Law: Buhai, I.S. (2006), “Customary Law Assessment and Aplications: Capital Punishment for Juvenile Offenders” (initial, ungated version), chapter in the volume “New Approaches in Humanistic Sciences” at Editura Stiintifica “Lumen” (“Lumen” Scientific Publishing House), ISBN-10 973-7766-74-1, Iasi, Romania
  
• Science Policy: Buhai, I.S. (2004), “Conditia Cercetatorului: Intre Realitatea de Acasa si Idealul din Afara” (in Romanian), Ad-Astra Journal (Young Romanian Scientists’ Journal), Vol 3 (2)
• Theoretical Physics: Buhai, I.S. (2001), “Classical Solutions to Double Oscillator Field Theory“, B.Sc. Honors Thesis, University College Utrecht, May 2001

For details and additional information please see my extended CV (PDF version).

Sebastian Buhai’s Research in Economics

Research Profile

“Basically, I’m not interested in doing research and I never have been; I’m interested in understanding, which is quite a different thing.” (David Blackwell)

I am primarily a Microeconometrician and Labor Economist, with further, eclectic interests in themes as well as methods typical of (Applied) Microeconomics, (Empirical) Industrial Organization, Game Theory, and Social Networks. Thematically, most of my research to date has studied labor and industrial markets type of questions revolving around, inter alia, human capital accumulation and dynamics of worker careers; bargaining, rent-sharing, and wage formation; persistent earnings and employment disparities; firm performance, investment in tangibles/ intangibles, and employee welfare. Methodologically, my research expertise is particularly developed so far in relation to, on the one hand, game theory, real option theory, and search & matching theory; and on the other hand, theoretical and applied dimensions of cross-sectional and panel-data econometrics, as well as structural modeling and causal inference in general.

You should also skim through my detailed research statement and/or my research profile in 5 slides.

Research Output

Original Research Journal Articles (peer-reviewed)

Returns to Tenure or Seniority? (with Miguel Portela, Coen Teulings and Aico van Vuuren), March 2014, Econometrica, 82 (2), pages 705–730, DOI: 10.3982/ECTA8688 . See also the corresponding Web Appendix or the old July 2009 version (includes theory framework).
Synopsis. This paper makes original contributions to the wage setting and internal labor markets literatures, conceptually and methodologically. We show that a worker’s tenure relative to her co-workers determines both her layoff probability and her wage, apart from other worker or firm (un)observables. We prove identification of this “seniority” effect in flexible duration and wage regression models, then estimate it on longitudinal LEED from Denmark and Portugal.
Keywords: wage dynamics, tenure, seniority, Last-In-First-Out
JEL-codes: J31, J41, J63

Tenure Profiles and Efficient Separation in a Stochastic Productivity Model (with Coen Teulings), May 2014, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 32:2, pages 245-258, DOI:10.1080/07350015.2013.866568 . See also the corresponding Web Appendix or the accepted, non-gated, November 2013 version. Trivia: The paper has earlier had a 2nd R&R at the Review of Economic Studies (and a change of the editor-in-charge for the 2nd resubmission).
Synopsis. This paper makes a critical methodological contribution with substantive implications in the wage dynamics literature. We use real option theory to model the stochastic evolution of worker-firm productivity matches, given job specific investments and efficient separations. We identify the model’s structural parameters from individual job durations & wages, and estimate them on US panel data, informing the incessant debate on wage returns to tenure.
Keywords: random productivity growth, efficient bargaining, job tenure, inverse gaussian, wage-tenure profiles, option theory
JEL-codes: C33, C41, J31, J63

How Productive is Workplace Health and Safety? (with Elena Cottini and Niels Westergaard-Nielsen), October 2017, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 119(4), pages 1086-1104, DOI:10.1111/sjoe.12184. See also the corresponding Online Appendix or the non-gated, December 2015 version. NB. Earlier WP versions of this article were entitled “The Impact of Workplace Conditions on Firm Performance”.
Synopsis. This paper makes a novel empirical contribution to both literatures on work environment and determinants of firm productivity, extending earlier methodology in this process. We study the causal effect of workplace health & safety indicators on total factor productivity, estimating augmented production functions that account for simultaneity and unobservable inputs; we use unique data, merging panel LEED to cross-sectional surveys on workplace conditions.
Keywords: occupational health and safety, work environment, firm performance, production function estimation
JEL codes: C33, C36, D24, J28, L23

A Social Network Analysis of Occupational Segregation (with Marco van der Leij), February 2023 (accepted December 2022), Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 147, 104593, DOI:10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104593. The accepted, non-gated Dec 2022 version; you can download it also as arXiv preprint (NB. you can also google and easily find several old and very old versions, in, e.g., various discussion paper series: the essence of the model and the main conclusions have never ever changed…).
Synopsis. This paper contributes to the literature on persistent employment and wage inequality with a novel applied theory framework. We model occupational segregation between races or genders when referrals matter for jobs and there is positive group-homophily, then we calibrate and simulate this model in a social-welfare analysis. We show that the game-theoretical equilibria, and both the 1^st and 2^nd-best utilitarian optimal welfare policies entail partial segregation.
Keywords: Social Networks, Homophily, Occupational Segregation, Labor Market Inequality, Social Welfare
JEL codes: J24, J31, J70, Z13

Downloadable (Unpublished) Research Working Papers

Firm downsizing, public policy, and the age structure of employment adjustments (with Hans-Martin von Gaudecker); current stage: being revised.
Synopsis. This paper combines thematically the labor demand and early retirement literatures, by means of ingenuous theoretical and empirical frameworks. We show theoretically and check empirically that distressed firms will dismiss with predilection their low-skilled employees eligible to retire early, given existing publicly-financed retirement schemes. We devise empirical strategies at individual exit & aggregate worker outflow level, on Danish LEED covering the entire set of mass layoff events over 2 decades, accounting for a number of reforms to the early pension system.
Keywords: early retirement, labour demand, employment adjustment, mass layoffs, LEED
JEL-codes: H32, H55, J26, J65

Selected Work in Progress (includes also some stagnant/ *temporarily* abandoned projects)

• Job Hazard Premia and Worker Risk Preferences; stage: presentation mode;

Synopsis. This paper tackles the classic compensating wage differential (CWD) theme from a novel empirical angle. I revisit CWD identification & estimation, using Danish longitudinal LEED merged to a representative longitudinal worker survey on job health and safety (dis)amenities. I estimate selection models accounting for the worker’s preference for risk, and firm and worker unobserved heterogeneity, relating the results obtained via hedonic wage regressions to those obtained from empirical hazard models using the worker employment histories.

• Performance Pay, Wage Dispersion, and Job Separation (with Miguel Portela); stage: presentation mode.

Synopsis. This paper makes new contributions to the literatures on incentive pay, inequality, and labor market dynamics.  We estimate the causal effect of performance related pay (PP) on worker wage growth, earnings inequality, and worker-firm separation. We account for endogeneity of both compensation policy and worker selection in PP-firms, using Portuguese LEED. A matching model with imperfect monitoring and learning on the job can rationalize our findings.

• Worker-Firm Dynamics with Seniority Bargaining (with Coen Teulings and Miguel Portela); stage: presentation mode.

Synopsis. This paper provides micro-foundations for the ubiquitous incumbent worker rents and insider bargaining power. We model the bargaining process generating the predictions tested in Buhai et al (2014, ECTA) and show, combining and extending the empirical frameworks from Buhai et al (2014, ECTA) and Buhai and Teulings (2014, JBES), that the seniority profile in wages is a proxy for the return to the extent of worker-firm specific investments.

• Employee Wage, Employer Size and Stochastic Labour Demand
• A Real Options Theory of Labor Turnover
• On the Role of Firms for Earnings Inequality and Worker Reallocation (with Paulo Guimarães and Miguel Portela)
• Evolving Occupational Tasks (with François Langot, Miguel Portela and Thepthida Sopraseuth)
• Firm Growth by Plant Expansion: Theory and Evidence using Danish LEED
• Agent-Based Modeling of Labor Market Flows (with Gheorghe C. Silaghi)
• Business Cycles and the Age Structure of Labour Adjustments. Structural Framework and Empirical Assessment (with Hans-Martin von Gaudecker)
• Disentangling Labor Adjustment Costs (with Miguel Portela)
• Experimental Evidence on Fairness among Workers (with Jens Grosser)

Published Research Dissertations and Research Reviews

Essays on Labour Markets: Worker-Firm Dynamics, Occupational Segregation and Workplace Conditions (digital version also accessible via the EUR online repository), PhD Thesis 2008, Erasmus University Rotterdam/ Tinbergen Institute, published as book by Thela Thesis -Academic Publishing Services, ISBN 978-90-5170-921-6, in the Tinbergen Institute Research Series (no. 431), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; November 2008

Wages, Seniority and Separation Rates in a Stochastic Productivity Model: A Comparative Perspective, MPhil Thesis 2003, Tinbergen Institute, published as monograph by the “Lumen” Scientific Publishing House (Editura “Lumen”), ISBN-10 973-7766-51-2, Iasi, Romania; February 2006

Quantile Regression: Overview and Selected Applications, Ad-Astra Journal (Young Romanian Scientists’ Journal), Vol. 4, 2005

Note on Panel Data Econometrics, Netherlands Network of Economics (NAKE) “Nieuws”, 15 (2), December 2003

Selected unpublished work from my graduate student days (surveys, reports, course papers, etc.)

On Risk in Educational Choice: Brief Overview and Research Note, December 2003

Investigating Reciprocal Motivation in Experimental Labor Markets, June 2003

Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm, January 2003

Job Search and Contact Networks, April 2002

Check out also my IZA – Institute of Labor Economics research profile. And you could also look at my ORCID, Scholar.Google, CienciaID, ResearcherID, IDEAS.RePEc, etc., all (at least partly) ‘automated’ profiles, though those are less complete/ correct (with some truly egregious in that regard…) than this webpage in organizing/ depicting my research output. My ORCID profile links also to other relevant research-related work, otherwise accessible via different pages of this website (e.g., recorded public lectures/ talks, various science popularization essays, policy analyses; etc.); as for automatic citation retrieval, Scholar.Google outperforms the alternatives while still underestimating my true citation counts* (* do note that relying only—or mostly—on raw citations, for whatever purpose, is naive… at best).

For more details/ further information about my past or ongoing research, including placement in my wider research context/ projects/ plans, links to presentation slides etc., please see my Detailed Research Statement. For publications/ dissertations in other scientific fields/ disciplines than Economics, please see the corresponding section of my Curriculum Vitae page; for works targeting a wider (both academic and sometimes non-academic) audience, please see my Essays page and/or my Media-Coverage page; you can also consult the list of courses followed during my graduate programs at the Tinbergen Institute, inter alia with (no longer updated) links to their instructors’ webpages (for external, specialized summer schools/ workshops, see the corresponding section in my extended CV). Last but not least, you should also read about my (mostly research-based) teaching activities.

NB. Annoying to occasionally find new studies—including newly published articles—citing old/ outdated drafts of my research papers, even in the cases where there are published versions by now. I do see it a professional obligation to have searched for a particular work’s latest version when citing it (or, alternatively, to have valid reasons for referring to older versions). Feel free to contact me if in doubt.

Sebastian Buhai’s Teaching in Economics

Teaching Philosophy

I am a keen promoter of research-based teaching, holding the view that both scientific research and (post)university-level teaching are sine qua non ingredients of true academe and highly complementary inputs in efficient academic production processes. The following quote from Wilhelm von Humboldt’s  (1810) “On the Internal and External Organization of the Higher Scientific Institutions in Berlin” aptly illustrates this perspective:

“Science cannot be truly lectured on as science without again conceiving of it as self-actuating each time, and it would be incomprehensible if people did not in fact in the process often come upon discoveries. Moreover, university teaching is not such an arduous business that it should be regarded as interruption of the leisure for study rather than an aid to the same.“

At the same time, I believe that modern university-level teaching ought to adapt to the preferences and needs of the modern student, inter alia always aware of/ adopting the latest teaching innovations, without compromising however on either depth or breadth of communication. To that extent, this quote by Herbert Simon is pertinent:

“Teaching is not entertainment, but it is unlikely to be successful unless it is entertaining.”

Teaching Background and Interests

I have formal training/ qualifications for higher-education teaching from The Netherlands and from France, and I have so far taught various courses in Denmark, Romania and Sweden—at undergraduate and graduate levels, to small and large classes, in longer-term and intensive “mini-course” formats, within university economics departments, business schools, and multidisciplinary research institutes.

My main teaching—and student supervision—interests are related to my main research interests:

• Microeconometrics (Theory, Methods, Applications; including parts that could be stand-alone courses, e.g., Structural Econometric Modeling, Causality in Social Sciences, Program Evaluation, Statistics in Econometrics, etc.)
• Labor Economics (Micro & Macro; including parts that could be taught as stand-alone courses, e.g., Personnel Economics, Economics of Education, Special Labor Markets, Search and Matching in Labor, etc.)
• (Empirical) Industrial Organization
• Economics of Strategy
• (Applied) Microeconomics

Teaching Experience

In inverse chronological order, with brief descriptions/ further information links for the more recent courses/ lectures:

• “Publishing meaningful scientific research in Economics (and related Social Sciences): A hands-on guidance for PhD students and researchers in Romania”, November 2017, mini-course organized by the Babes-Bolyai University (UBB) ’s Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology (STAR-UBB Institute) and its Center for Continuing Education and Distance Learning (CFCIDFR), Cluj-Napoca, Romania; course synopsis (including detailed recommended reading).
  • Graduate level mini-course, approx. 40 participants (PhD or postdoc researchers from various sciences, especially, but not exclusively, from Social Sciences and Economics); organized as 2 intensive lectures x 3 hours each.
  • Aims:  hands-on-guidance on how to produce and disseminate what counts as meaningful scientific research in Economics from the current, mainstream, international perspective. While the lectures were primarily targeting scholars and doctoral/ master students in Economic Sciences from Romanian universities and research institutes, anybody interested in Social Sciences more generally could potentially benefit from the pragmatic discussion and tips on academic reading, writing, speaking, publishing, as well as interacting with the wider society.

•  “Introduction to Structural Econometric Modeling”, September 2017, invited guest lecturer within the course “Economics Research and Communication”, at Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
  • Undergraduate level, with approx. 35 student participants (some part of the Erasmus exchange)
  • Aims and goals: overview of the debate/polemic between structural vs. atheoretical approaches in applied (micro)econometrics; construction/ evaluation of structural econometric models; (light) introduction to structural modeling of IO demand systems. See short list of  recommended further reading.

• “Topics in Empirical Industrial Organization”, July 2017: intensive crash/refresh mini-course, at the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; associated to the ERMAS 2017 conference (conference keynote speakers: Eric Maskin, Ariel Pakes, Aureo de Paula, and Victor Rios-Rull); online mini-course description, including recommended literature (also via https://econ.ubbcluj.ro/ermas2017/en/curs.php)
  • Graduate/ continuing-education mini-course, with approx. 35 participants (including Economics PhD students and faculty from various Romanian universities, as well as practitioners from the Competition Council in Romania, etc.); organized as 2 intensive sessions of 3 hours
  • Aims and goals: overview of some of the state-of-the-art econometrics tools for analyzing industrial market outcomes; I covered the main methodological issues arising in the estimation of demand systems, the estimation of production functions, and I gave a bird’s-eye view on the empirical analysis of dynamic oligopoly games.

• “Industrial Economics” (co-taught), Fall 2008 + Fall 2009, at Department of Economics, Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus University; renamed “Advanced Industrial Economics” at Aarhus more recently
  • Large master level course, with approx. 250 master students; consisted of 27 formal lectures spread over 7 weeks, with 4 lectures (once 3)/ week (usually organized as 2 consecutive lectures, in each of 2 separate week days), and final 3-hour written exam as course assessment; course credits: 5 ECTS.
  • Aims and goals: Students are expected to become familiar with the various models of competition, the determinants of market structure, the conditions that make collusion attractive/ feasible, and the role of competition policy. Inter alia, the course seeks to provide basic tools for understanding differences in the intensity of competition across industries, and its consequences on prices, quantities, quality choice, efficiency, welfare, market structure, and the possibilities of collusion.
  • Topics I taught: entry deterrence / accommodation; product differentiation; market concentration/ power; price collusion; demand system estimation; production function estimation; etc.

• “Economics of Strategy” (co-taught), Fall ‘08 + Spring 2010, at the Department of Economics, Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus University
  • Large master level course, with approx. 150 master students; consisted of 27 formal lectures spread over 7 weeks, with 4 (once 3) lectures/ week (usually organized as 2 consecutive lectures in each of 2 separate week days), plus a final 3h written exam as course assessment; course credits: 5 ECTS.
  • Aims and goals: Students are expected to understand how a firm can build an organization to achieve strategic goals. Inter alia, this implies studying the boundaries of the firm, the development of newer trends such as outsourcing, offshoring, crowdsourcing, how firms can create incentives to motivate employees to work in their best interest, and how firm structure generally relates to firm strategy.
  • Topics I taught: agency, ownership and control; horizontal and vertical boundaries of the firm; incomplete contracts and the property right approach; relational contracts; corporate hierarchy and culture; etc.

• “Descriptive Economics”, Fall 2008 to Spring 2009, Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus University
  • Bachelor level course: instruction/ supervision of small groups of students in writing, presenting, and acting as discussants of their colleagues’ term-length individual ‘seminar’ papers. Organized as follows: 2 lectures, plus (optional) meetings with each student during Fall 2008; subsequent presentation/debate sessions (1 student presenter, and 2 “opponents”) of standard lecture time, in Spring 2009 (end March- May); course credits: 5 ECTS.
  • Aims and goals: Students are expected to acquire introductory notions of basic Econometrics applied to specific topics within (in my case) “Labor Markets” and respectively “Education”, concretized through their writing/ presenting/ discussing of term-length descriptive empirical papers.

Sebastian Buhai’s Miscellaneous Essays and Public Talks/ Presentations

Next to the selected essays and presentations from below, I also post (lately less regularly…) in blog essay format on these weblogs:

• Personal blog (posts in English/ Romanian). View also my former blog (NB: if some links for older posts do not work in my current blog, they might work in my former—where they mechanically migrated from).
• Blog EconAcademia (posts in Romanian): blog by Romanian academic economists, which I initiated in Dec 2014; direct link to my posts there.

Related relevant material (including long interviews, hence de facto also ‘essays’…) is available under my media-coverage page. You could also check out a selection of my undergrad student essays/ articles (all in English) from University College Utrecht, Utrecht University on my “UCU” page.

Most essays/ talks collected on this page target a wider audience—although their thematic usually deals with economics, socio-economic policy; scientific research, (post)university education or other academe-related topics. The documents linked below are usually in Romanian, though in some cases I have provided brief descriptions in English next to the links.

Click around the icon and/or the corresponding links to download/ access the PDF (or other online format) copies. Neither the links, nor the explanations are typically updated subsequent to their initial posting here, hence it is possible that some links have ceased working or have moved, etc: let know if you find such cases (I have sometimes anticipated that by also providing print-screen PDFs of online-published versions, etc.).

Selection of some relatively recent essays/ presentations:

• “Economia – între știință, artă și politici publice“, March 2022, my (approx.) 1h30min invited public lecture (in Romanian) within the Studium Generale series of the STAR-UBB Institute (the elite wing of Babes-Bolyai University=UBB, the largest and highest ranked university in Romania), inside “Turnul Croitorilor” (“The Tailors’ Tower”), one of the historical/ architectural symbols of the city of Cluj-Napoca. Aimed for a general audience, it discussed “Economics – between science, art, and public policy” (download the slides in PDF )— being broadcast live/ available online on the YouTube and on the Facebook of the Babes-Bolyai University. More information (in Romanian) on the UBB-STAR Institute’s site  and on my blog (there including some ex post questions from the audience and my answers for the relevant ones etc.); see also my twitter (thread) notifications (or UBB’s twitter notifications here and here) about this event.
  
• “Romania, CE 2021: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”, November 2021, my brief presentation on Romania’s less than rosy socio-economic/ political reality in pandemic times, as part of a panel discussion comprising also representatives of Fitch Ratings and Banca Transilvania, the largest bank in Romania; the panel was organized by Credit Europe Bank within their country risk profiles series (the Chatham House Rule applies).
  
• “Despre Capitalism si Economie de Piata, in Varianta Contemporana” (“On Capitalism and Market Economy, in Contemporaneous Variant”), June 2018, prepared for the July-August number (nr. 53) of the Romanian cultural magazine “Revista Sinteza“. After an initial magazine embargo period, now you can also read Revista Sinteza’s ungated online  version (includes the diacritics specific to the Romanian language—which however seem to have introduced also a few typos—, has nice formatting, great pics of Adam Smith and yours truly, but loses the footnotes/ bits of text from my initial PDF version linked above); the published version has also appeared online in “Jurnalul Bucurestiului”. This short essay discusses a contemporaneous perspective on capitalism and market economy, inter alia exploring the current role and scope of state and regulatory agencies interventions on the market, and at the same time invites the motivated reader to get a more in depth treatment by digesting two recent books by Luigi Zingales (2012): “A Capitalism for the People. Recapturing the Lost Genius of American Prosperity” and respectively Paul de Grauwe (2017): “The Limits of the Market. The Pendulum Between Government and Market” (listed also as references at the end of the essay).
  
• “The Rise for Academic Integrity in Romanian (Domestic) Economic Sciences“, online on 4 Dec 2016. Co-authored by 9 Romanian economists from universities both abroad and inside Romania, this study—complementing an earlier analysis by Buhai, Litan and Silaghi (2015), see bullet point below—shows that in Romania (= an EU member, to put it into perspective) almost no academic economists meet basic international criteria for research quality, such that its research output in Economic Sciences, adjusted for quality according to (any usual) international standards, is half that of Africa’s average(!), below that of much more unfortunate countries such as, e.g., Cameroon, Uganda, Ghana, Nigeria… (not a joke, sadly). At the same time, the national evaluation/ promotion standards used in this field are fully out of line, such that even academics of global acclaim, including Nobel Laureates, John Bates Clark, or Yrjö Jahnsson awardees, would not *minimally qualify* for Econ professorships in Romanian univs (no joke either). Given that domestic criteria in place have been decided by individuals failing any international scientific standards, some of whom also violate academic ethic in other ways, and that those people continue to have influence over criteria to be set in the future, this is unlikely to change on its own. We therefore ask the global community of academics’ support for restoring sanity and decency to Economic Sciences in Romania, while calling on all domestic economists to rise for academic integrity and honor, for proper recognition of scientific values. The conclusions of this analysis have been commented by various mass media, including newspapers, radio, and news outlets; see my media coverage page for entries in December 2016 for such links. A large number of (foreign or domestic, including from other sciences) academics have already expressed dismay at the current state of affairs in RO Econ—for public reactions see, e.g., (re)tweets on the EconAcademia twitter in Dec 2016.

• “Disincentivizing the performance: the case of the Romanian national criteria for evaluating research in Economic Sciences”: English abstract of an article (in Romanian) that I wrote together with Cristian Litan and Gheorghe Silaghi in December 2015, as a chapter of the 2015 Report of the Think Tank G3A, concerning Science Policy in Romania (Report published in the December 2015 edition of the Journal of Science Policy and Scientometrics/ Revista de Politica Stiintei si Scientometrie). This paper was also presented, in English, in a plenary session on misevaluation of the RO Econ academe, at the ERMAS 2016 conference in Timisoara. We provided a descriptive analysis showing the absurdity of the Romanian national criteria for evaluating scientific research, and their consequences materializing in the proliferation and promotion of scientific pseudo-values, in the case of the Economic Sciences. Under the pretext of local scientometric objectivity, there are currently in use in Romania domestic evaluation standards that have nothing in common with the international academic standards used in the civilized world, explicitly ignoring the quality of the publications and implicitly disincentivizing performance and excellence in scientific research. This study (and its subsequent plenary conference presentation) has received extensive press (and even national television!) coverage in Romania: for collections of such links please see the ERMAS 2016 mass-media exposure document, the entries dated Aug/Sep 2016 on my media coverage page, or a brief summary (with reader comments) on my blog.  Finally, this article has been also published—and subsequently discussed through blog comments—on Blog EconAcademia, a blog of Romanian economists initiated in Dec 2014.

• About an opportunity for the National Bank of Romania to make history and revolutionize research and graduate teaching in Economics within Romania, by following the Bank of Italy’s and Bank of Spain’s example with their EIEF and CEMFI institutes, and setting the basis of a “Romanian Institute for Economics and Finance” (Institutul Roman pentru Economie si Finante=IREF in Romanian): I wrote this essay (in Romanian) on 1 June 2015 for Blog EconAcademia, a blog of Romanian academic economists that I initiated. This initial article was excellently adapted for the Romanian newspaper Adevarul by Remus Florescu; see also my press coverage page: look up the entry for 17 June 2015.

• Initiating manifesto – in Romanian and respectively, in English – for the 1st Edition of the Annual Scientific Conference of Romanian Academic Economists from Abroad (in Romanian: 1a Editie a Conferintei Stiintifice a Economistilor Romani din Mediul Academic din Strainatate= ERMAS), co-authored with Mihai Copaciu, Cosmin Ilut, and Cristian Litan, in December 2013. A brochure for that conference, gathering several documents (the manifesto, our call for papers, the final program, and the list of participants) can be accessed here in Romanian or here in English. Full details at conferinta.econacademia.net or, easier for only English speaking folks, at english.econacademia.net. We also wrote a short statement for the Romanian press underlining some of the expectations for this conference (many of them fulfilled, a posteriori). See also a PDF list with links to press coverage of the ERMAS 2014 conference and its aftermath (including press coverage of our being awarded one of the “Top 100: People and Ideas that Move Romania” Foreign Policy (FP) Romania Prizes, at the category “Ideas/Projects”, in early March 2015, for initiating this ERMAS conference).

• Detailed answers to what finally became an unpublished 10-questions “interview” requested by Romanian national newspaper “Romania Libera”, 10 February 2012 (in Romanian)

• An article entitled “Unii dintre noi vom avea atâta timp liber încât ne vom plictisi. Altii deloc…” (this direct link to the article in Cotidianul online appears to have stopped working at some point, but use the link to the PDF copy from earlier) that I wrote for the Romanian newspaper Cotidianul in their series “5000 de  semne ale viitorului”, published on the 20th of April 2008 (some info about the series in this article by Alexandra Badicioiu). The article linked above also contains some biographical information (both the article and the information have been edited by the journalists from Cotidianul to fit the required space and the format). If the direct link above stops functioning properly, you have above a link to the version saved on my site. There are also some more details and further references to the article linked in the comments section of this post on my old blog. The whole series was then published in a companion book “5000 de semne ale viitorului”: scan of  front cover, first page of my article, second page of my article.

• Scientific Colloquium of Romanian researchers in Denmark, at the residence of the Romanian Ambassador in Denmark, Theodor Paleologu, on the 10th of March 2007. I presented “Economia ca stiinta sau despre imperialismul economic intre stiintele sociale”; you can dowload the PDF presentation linked at the start of this paragraph (in Romanian). I talked a bit more about this colloquium on my blog (also in Romanian). And you can also find something about this event on the site of the Romanian Embassy in DK.

Selection of older essays/ presentations, published in various Romanian mass-media (online or in print format; click to download):

First some short articles (in unedited version) published within the Educational Supplement of the newspaper Gandul, on the lives of several Nobel Laureates (that section is actually called, in direct translation from Romanian, “the Nobel Laureates are also humans…”). I don’t know yet if I will continue with this series.

• John Harsanyi: O Calatorie Incredibila sau “Daca Vrei cu Adevarat, Poti!” (You can also read this from my blog)- this has not been published in Gandul yet (or this is what I know, it sounds incredible but I am actually never informed whether something was published, will be published and so on- another reason why I am not sure whether it is worth continuing- my 100% voluntary- collaboration there).
• Jan Tinbergen: Un Om de Stiinta Coborat din Turnul de Fildes (I posted this also on my weblog, here).
• Jim Heckman: Independenta, Perseverenta, Excelenta. Punct si de la Capat… (You can also access it via my weblog)

I also published a short economic article (the most difficult part was to keep it that short) in the newspaper Cotidianul.

• Snapshot Economic al Europei in Tranzitie: Noiembrie 2005 .You can also read it directly on their site (I also posted it on my weblog).

I wrote another article

• Liber-Schimbismul,. Protectionismul si…Amatorismul

initially for the same newspaper Cotidianul but apparently they did not like it (I say “apparently”, since in fact I was never given a reason for “why not”, which is what I would have expected from rational people) so at the very end of the day I ended up just posting it on my blog. Well, who’s interested will find it, read it and- you’re welcome to, by the way- comment on it and on anything else that you find on this page.

I continue with the listing some articles that were initially published on the Romanian online independent portal “Romania, Libera in Viitor” (RLIV), within its weekly electronic publication called “ACUM” (you can find all other articles I wrote for RLIV-ACUM here), sometimes followed by their commenting or re-publication also in other mass-media outlets.

Highlights from RLIV-ACUM (especially articles concerned with science and research policy in Romania):

• Perspectiva Candidatilor la Presedintie asupra Cercetarii, Stiintei si Tehnologiei. Exemplul SUA, Deziderat in Romania

My questions concerning the status of scientific research in Romania from the second part of this article (the essay was published here, in the RLIV-ACUM’s “Research, Science, Technology” (in Romanian: “Cercetare, Stiinta, Tehnologie”) section that I founded and maintained as editor until June 2005), inspired from the questions addressed by the prestigious journal Science to the USA presidential candidates and addressed to the Romanian presidential candidates in 2004, were publicly sustained by means of open letters, by the Ad-Astra Association of Romanian Researchers (in Romanian: Asociatia “Ad-Astra” a Cercetatorilor Romani), the Romanian Academic Forum (in Romanian: Forumul Academic Roman=FAR) and by several scientists of Romanian origin, including the Nobel Prize Laureate, Professor George Emil Palade. Some accounts in the mass-media and on the web sites of the organizations involved can be read in what follows: press communicate FAR, press communicates Ad-Astra, open letter signed also by Prof. Palade, other echoes in the Romanian mass-media: Evenimentul Zilei (also here and here), Ziua (also here), Romanian Global News (also here). Two of the Romanian presidential candidates answered the questions, Mr. Marko Bela and Mr. Adrian Nastase. A reaction of FAR to these two answers can be read here.

• Renasterea Prestigiului Doctoral in Romania

This short essay is the result of a joint brainstorming of several Romanian scientists working in research outside Romania, voluntarily organized in a taskforce to help the Romanian Ministry of Education in its planned reform of the Romanian High Education and Research sectors- it summarizes imperative measures needed to reform the doctoral programs in Romania and to consequently contribute to the rebirth of the Romanian doctoral prestige. It was published here, in the section “Cercetare, Stiinta, Tehnologie” of RLIV-ACUM. Miruna Munteanu wrote an excellent article related to this document in Ziua.

• Conditia Cercetatorului Stiintific: Intre Realitatea de Acasa si Idealul din Afara

I wrote this essay linked above for the conference “Migration of Young Romanian Researchers: Performances and Possibilities of Return”, organized by the Romanian Cultural Institute (Institutul Cultural Roman=ICR) in Sinaia,October 2004. The essay can be found on the site of the ICR, it was published also on RLIV-ACUM (here with the abstract in the beginning as well), and in the Ad-Astra Journal.

• PDF Presentation of the paper “Conditia Cercetatorului…” (plus some other thoughts), at the Sinaia conference mentioned above

Some people in the audience totally disagreed with me, but that presentation seemed to be interesting (provoking?) enough to get me quite a few subsequent interviews for Romanian TV channels, radio, and press…

Other— random selection—articles published in RLIV-ACUM (selection):

• Scurt despre Zei si Pamanteni in Context Autohton
• Cum Clavis: Modul de Alegere a Viitorului Papa
• Opinia Cititorului: Cu Trenul prin Romania. Partea a II-a
• A Face o Diferenta
• Noteaza-ti profesorii: www.calificativ.ro
• Reflectii (Utopice) de Duminica Seara pe Tema Societatii Civile Active
• Opinia Cititorului: Cu Trenul prin Romania
• Cat de Fioros Este Leul Greu? Despre Implicatiile Denominarii Monedei Nationale din Iulie 2005
• Consideratii Subiective asupra Retoricii Publice: Logos, Pathos, Ethos in Versiune Mioritica
• Note de Trecere, Mizerii si Dogme
• Elitele Autohtone: Conflict si Mediocritate (Pledoarie pentru Cooperare)
• Plesu si Mancatorii de Sarmale
• Un ecou la “Elementele Nonverbale…”
• Ma-Ia-Hii, Ma-Ia-Huu, Ma-Ia-Hoo, Ma-Ia-Haa si Adevarata Muzica Romaneasca
• Germania de Est: Popularitate Ingrijoratoare a Extremismului Politic
• Performanta Economica a Presedintilor Americani in Perioada Postbelica
• Talmaciri din Harry Mulisch: “Descoperirea Paradisului”
• “Cercetare, Stiinta, Tehnologie”: O Rubrica la Inceput de Drum
• 15 milioane de Oameni
• Fahrenheit 9/11- FILMUL

Mass-media coverage of Sebastian Buhai

Below you can check out a selection of press/magazine articles and other news media, including television or radio talk-shows, where I have been interviewed/ covered (with saved PDF versions where possible—clicking around —should the direct links cease to function); although most articles are in Romanian, they have often got brief explanations in English below on this page (for newer items). Please note that the items are typically not updated/ rechecked after their initial posting. The starred ones are larger contributions (long interviews, live talk-shows, etc.). In reverse chronological order (and usually listed on this page with a time lag):

• Adevarul, 28 June 2024 — or download copy (also see tweet from then, announcing it): an interview in the Romanian MSM Adevarul, with Remus Florescu as interviewer, in which I briefly explain why the (re)introduction of a 6-day workweek does not have the potential to solve structural problems on the labor market—and may well be counterproductive—whether in Greece (which was preparing to enact it from July 2024), in Romania (as demanded by surprisingly many, following Greece’s example), or anywhere…
• Panorama, 27 August 2023 — or download simplified copy (& see also my tweet on that): an essay by journalist Răzvan Zamfir from online Romanian business/ economics magazine Panorama that contains, next to a couple of others’ perspectives, my view on some of Romania’s gravest economic errors within the last 3 decades (selected and exposed by the Panorama journalist from several of my earlier published essays/ interviews on these topics, and a brief recent correspondence with him). The Romanian title of the Panorama essay: “Marile greșeli economice care trag România înapoi de 30 de ani”.  NB. I am evidently only responsible for my own views — and not for those of any of the other discussants in this piece.
• PressOne, 26 June 2023 — or download a simplified copy (see also a tweet first announcing that): a material containing, inter alia, the summary of my brief discussion with journalist Răzvan Filip from Romanian online MSM PressOne Romania on whether and when a policy of VAT reduction (but also of capping prices, more generally) for basic goods would make sense (highlighting in particular the IO perspective of that ongoing debate, which is both the most relevant and typically the most ignored), focusing on the context at that time in Romania. The title of R. Filip’s piece, in Romanian: “Reducerea prețurilor la alimentele de bază: o idee bună sau un instrument cu două tăișuri? Argumente pro și contra de la doi experți”. NB. Obviously, I am only responsible for my own answers/ ideas — and not for those of the other invited discussant from the same essay.
• Adevarul, 7 February 2023 — and/or download simplified copy (& see also a tweet announcing this): an interview in the Romanian MSM Adevarul (R. Florescu interviewer) in which I explained inter alia why a year after the Russian criminal invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent calling for and partial implementation of economic sanctions against the aggressor, Germany/ the EU economy more generally is surviving just fine w/out any Russian gas — in spite of the doomsday “winter is coming” predictions from the Kremlin and their acolytes, as well as the many idiots from Germany/ EU/ elsewhere who couldn’t bring themselves to cease all imports of Russian energy on their own/ much earlier/ much more comprehensively and decisively. (Among the bullet points just below on this page, you can also search for related interviews from the same Adevarul newspaper in 2022, where I had argued for the imposition of sanctions and against doomsday economic fears.)
• Adevarul, 12 April 2022 (and/ or download simplified copy + see also my tweet announcing this), in Romanian: interview in Romanian MSM Adevarul, with Remus Florescu as interviewer/ editor, on (what-would-be-) the moral strategic and visionary decision (unfortunately without decision makers mature enough to take/ enable it…) of ceasing all imports of Russian energy in Romania (discussed also within the larger EU context); the price that Romania (or rather: its clueless, spineless, useless current political leaders) doesn’t seem so far to be prepared to pay is not more, in the worst possible case, than an average of about 80 euro/ capita, year (according to recent analyses by Langot and Tripier (2022) — which is very similar to Baquee et al (2022) or Bachmann et al (2022)– all of which I refer to in the interview)…  Here’s a short translated fragment to serve as conclusion/ main point of this interview: “Interviewer: What do you think is the price for not taking these measures [stopping all current RU energy imports]? Me: The price of inaction is the war crimes, massacres, horrors from Mariupol, Bucha, Borodyanka, Kramatorsk and the rest of Ukraine, many of which we have not yet heard of. Those who must decide and have not yet decided to do everything in their power to stop the Russians are complicit in these atrocities and will be judged as such by history. Interviewer: Do you think that Romania would benefit if it took the measure independently of the other European states? Me: Absolutely. It would be a moral, strategic, visionary act. But do we have leaders with these qualities? ….” This was a third interview in Adevarul about necessary economic sanctions on Russia in the context of the current invasion of Ukraine, see also the bullet points below on this page corresponding to earlier interviews on 11 Mar and 27 Feb.
• Profit News, 4 April 2022 (between approx. 0.34-0.48) – or, for faster loading/ download, see just my own intervention here, separately saved on YouTube  (also about it on my twitter) – recording of a live interview on the RO national TV channel Profit News about some of the humanitarian and economic impacts of the Russian criminal invasion in Ukraine, with Raluca Al Haddad as interviewer/ moderator. It turned out that I had less time for this than I had thought I would have, hence eventually I just managed to gloss over the humanitarian crisis aspect (e.g., concerning the refugee inflow from Ukraine into the neighboring countries/ Europe more generally, the difficulties with coordinating/ allocating all that influx– inter alia, comparing with the previous Syrian refugee crisis that EU had to deal with–, while ensuring the basic, immediate needs for all those people), plus extremely briefly over the direct damages to the Ukraine economy/ infrastructure, the regional/ global effects in terms of propagating negative food supply shocks, etc.
• Adevarul, 11 March 2022 (downloadable copy, also my tweet about this), in Romanian: interview in RO national journal Adevarul, with Remus Florescu as interviewer/ editor, about the most efficient economic sanctions against Russia, e.g., cutting the almost €1 billion per day(!) at the time of the interview still transferred to Putin for energy imports (oil, oil derivatives, and gas), and the hypocrisy/ lack of vision of EU leaders (DE particularly) for not having already applied them — essentially continuing to finance Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, while at the same time decrying it… Referencing/ citing Luis Garicano + a bunch of recent studies on Russia’s depending on its energy exports, the effect of the eventual sanctions on Germany’s economy, etc. This interview was also extremely mediatized/ cross-promoted on several online news sites, as well as on various social media (NB. mea culpa for not having the time to address… or even read… the hundreds of questions/ comments raised on those sites, as well as to me individually…). See also the bullet point just below for an earlier interview on initial/ possible economic sanctions against Russia.
• Adevarul, 27 February 2022 (print simplified copy), in Romanian: interview in national MSM Adevarul discussing early economic sanctions applicable to Russia in order to compel it to desist and stop its invasion of Ukraine. Inter alia, this is about my being utterly amazed that the exclusion of Russian banks from SWIFT is still met with some reticence and that some of the more effective means within the full arsenal of possible punitive economic measures (including seizing the assets of Russian oligarchs supporting/ enabling/ financing the Kremlin) have to date not been seriously considered. There is absolutely no time to waste, and economic sanctions can be extremely effective to stop Putin’s criminal insanity before it scales up: if only decision makers (especially those from the EU states, many of which have a lot of commercial links with Russia) had/ found the, now sine qua non, long-term vision and leadership qualities! See also an EconAcademia tweet about this interview.
• Adevarul, 16 February 2022 (or download simplified copy), in Romanian; published interview in this major Romanian MSM, Adevarul (Remus Florescu interviewer), about Romania’s *total lack of* preparation/ even willingness in the fight against global warming/ transition towards a “green economy”, despite it being a signatory to the EU’s “Fit for 55” ambitious program; I have also discussed a bit about the lack of progress in this realm at the global level: COP26 an utter failure not unlike previous ones, with the first, “COP1”, of the fruitless yearly meetings already 3 decades ago this year… A considerably longer, unedited, earlier version of this interview is available on my blog (inter alia including much more on the economic instruments needed to fight climate change, many further references, answers to questions raised in the comments, etc). See also my tweets (thread) about the published version.
• Profit News, 24 January 2022 (between approx. 0.37-0.51), or, especially for those with slower connections, you can see just my intervention here, placed on YouTube, recording of a live interview on the economics/ business- related RO national TV channel Profit News about minimum wages in Romania/ EU/ world, with Adriana Nedelea as moderator– see also about that via my twitter. Among others (but do listen to the interview, if you understand Romanian, there is more there), I’ve explained a bit why the debates around a decent minimum wage are misinterpreted outside the academic literature (in particular why in a realistic labour market monopsony/ oligopsony the usual– badly understood outside the academe– facts about the tradeoff between employment/ level of minimum wages in purely competitive markets *do not apply* to the same extent, or are even muted); why the Romanian minimum wages, even though they increased over the last 15 years, are still very low compared to what they ought to be for a decent society welfare — or compared to the rest of the EU, including some of our CEE neighbours (in addition: why people, including idiotic Ministers of Finance, confuse gross and net rates, even though in Romania with contributions shifted mostly to the employees since 2018 this matters greatly), why *complementary* socio-economic policies are obviously desirable but never *substitutable* to decent minimum wages — especially so in a country like RO, with high and increasing inequality, huge rate of poverty and risk of social exclusion, extremely low labour force market participation among some of the vulnerable groups, a huge and constantly growing workforce deficit, and weak and purely formal employer-employee collective negotiations; I’ve also discussed about the EU recent initiative of a directive on minimum wages, etc. NB. See also the links with interviews from below or my essays webpage for more information/ details on all these topics.
• Profit News, 10 January 2022 (between approx. min. 0.34-0.49), or, better for those with slow connections, see here just that fragment alone placed on YouTube, recording of a live 15-min interview on the economics/ business- related RO national TV channel Profit News, with Adriana Nedelea as moderator (see also a sequence of announcements about that via my twitter). I’ve discussed, among others: facts concerning the current Romanian labour market (e.g., disparities regarding labour force participation by age, gender, education; large and pandemic-exacerbated earnings inequality, etc.); projections concerning the envisaged future of the labour market, on the background of the population ageing, automatization/ digitalisation, decarbonisation/ transition towards a greener economy, including the sectors/ occupations/ jobs most in demand; how (dis)connected are the current education/ training and the expected labour market skills (with some detail on the disastrous situation concerning basic know-know relevant to the digital economy/ society dimension); the total lack of competence/ preparation/ even interest of the Romanian policy maker concerning social, health and education policy (with focus on a specific case, typical of the general chaos reigning there: they’ve ex post realised that *nobody* internally employed at the Authority for the Digitalisation of Romania, newly inaugurated part of the RO Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalisation, had any, whatsoever, training/ competence to even *understand* what they need to do to fulfill the objectives stipulated in the large ‘digitalisation’ chapter of the NextEU plan for economic recovery and resilience); general recommendations concerning competencies and skills to try to acquire, for both younger generations and older participants on the labour market, etc.
• Adevarul, 4 January 2022 (or simplified copy on my website), in Romanian, an interview in this major MSM, Adevarul, entitled “Joburile viitorului: ce se cere pe piata muncii in urmatorul deceniu in Romania si de ce nu suntem pregatiti” (en: The jobs of the future: what is on demand on the future labor market in Romania in the next decade and why we are not prepared for that). I’ve answered questions about some of the projections concerning jobs/ occupations which will be on the greatest demand within the next decade (inter alia, discussing about the forecasts of the US BLS, McKinsey, or the World Economic Forum in that regard), as well as on the skills/ competences needed for that. One particular domain, of serious concern in Romania given its current status quo, is the digital competences register, but also the general adult/ life-long education (the lowest within the EU, for instance). For more details and an unedited version of this published interview with Remus Florescu, you can also read this blogpost, which also links to some of my previous interventions concerning the Romanian labour market (see also twitter announcement).
• Adevarul, 8 December 2021 (simplified copy on website), in Romanian, also announced on my twitter: an interview in one of the Romanian main newspapers, Adevarul, about the large and by now long-lasting workforce deficit in Romania (and not only in Romania—though in Romania/ Eastern Europe this problem is arguably much older than in other parts of the EU, or the USA, not just a recent post-pandemic restriction phenomenon, etc.), at all skill levels, as well as what are some of the potential solutions, at both corporate and public policy level, to solve or at least alleviate that problem (with thanks for the questions and the final edit to journalist Remus Florescu).
• Adevarul, 24 November 2021 (simplified copy on my website), in Romanian, see also on my twitter: an interview with Remus Florescu for Adevarul, one of the main national newspapers in Romania, entitled “Viitorul muncii este hibrid” (=”The Future of Work is Hybrid”). I’ve answered some questions concerning the spread/ dynamics of telework (pre- and especially since the Covid-19 pandemic), zooming in on EU/ Romania, and trying also to forecast a few trends for the future in this context. Among others, it is obvious that telework is here to stay and shape the structure of future labor markets, including, indirectly, for sectors where it cannot be readily utilized (for instance, by shortening the duration of the working week); at the same time, particularly with respect to knowledge-intensive industries and occupations, it is also clear to me that the enormous positive externalities of face-to-face interaction will not be substitutable too soon.
•  FinEco24News, 8 November 2021 (simplified copy on my website), in Romanian—see also short description on twitter: wide-ranging discussion on Norel Moise’s popular “FinEco24News” blog (N. Moise is the chief editor of ‘Piata Financiara’, well-known Romanian economic & finance MSM) about, among others, Romania’s consumption-led, unsustainable economic growth; its striking inequality, poverty, and social exclusion problems; its 3-decade long twin deficit dilemma, on the background of the continuous, staggering decision makers’ ignorance and incompetence; the potential impact of the NextGenerationEU package on the Romanian economy, though plenty of vagueness and incoherence in the plan for economic recovery and resilience (particularly egregious is, e.g., the climate/ environment chapter) submitted by Romania to—and somehow, barely, eventually approved by— the EU Commission; the sheer absurdity of funding/ governance pertaining to scientific research and more generally R&D in my birth country; what we have learnt/ should learn from the ongoing global supply chain crisis and the need for strategic industrial policy; etc. This interview was also publicized by the Business Report of HotNews, as well as other outlets.
• HotNews, 28 October 2021 (simplified copy on my website), in Romanian—see also a short description on twitter, at the time of its publication: an interview on HotNews.ro (major Romanian MSM), with Ramona Florea as interviewer, about my perspective on the notion of “respect” in general (it even includes a tad moral philosophy 1.0.1 flavour!), as well as respect applied in more specific contexts, such as respect for work in Romania (got quite specific on work environment conditions/ satisfaction with them in RO vs elsewhere); or respect for economists/ economic education in Romania (which domestic “economists”? will the real economists please stand up?… who should and who can teach/ disseminate economics in RO? who should be hailed a public intellectual among these “economists” and economists?…  can you trust an “economist” Prime-Minister who hasn’t got a clue about the price of a loaf of bread? or an “economist” Minister of Finance who doesn’t know the minimum wage in his country? how about the zillion econ “professors” and “academicians” in my fascinating country of birth who never published in any scientific outlet that you ought to care about?…)
• VICE Romania, contributions to two interesting essays by Stefan Alin Dragomir about socio-economic systems then and now, inter alia debunking some myths and other widely held beliefs, published on 20 August 2021 (titled “Ce nu înțeleg acei români anti-capitaliști când se închină la Marx și comunismul lui Ceaușescu”) and respectively on 13 September 2021 (titled: “Am vorbit cu tineri români care vor să salveze lumea de capitalism”), see also my short twitter announcement on this latter one. NB. Those interested to read more about the economic dimension of capitalism can also consult this older, short essay of mine on that theme (referenced also in the first essay from Vice mentioned above), also aimed for a general audience.
• HotNews, 10 August 2021 (simplified PDF on my website), in Romanian (see also short description on twitter, at the time of the publication): ample, wide-ranging interview/ discussion with Dan Popa on HotNews.ro (a major Romanian MSM) about, among other things, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on various personal and aggregate dimensions; why one should vaccinate anti Covid-19; the (inexistence of relevant) Romanian domestic economic research; even about some recent recommended books and movies (linked to the other points raised in the interview): among others, I’ve praised and strongly recommended recent econ-based books for a general audience by Dani Rodrik, Jean Tirole, or Christian Gollier. NB. This interview has also got plenty of references to other material, including to older interviews that can be also found below on this page, or to essays/ articles that can be found on other pages of my website.
• VICE Romania, 27 May 2020, 45 min live interview in Romanian on their instagram, as part of their series “Expertul VICE” (VICE RO interviewers/ hosts Cosmin Pojaranu and Razvan Baltaretu); see also my twitter announcements (with links) related to this event, from 26 May and 27 May. Among other things (all chosen by VICE Romania or sent in by their audience) I briefly tackled: the type of economic crisis originating with the Covid-19 pandemic; the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in Romania (and elsewhere) and economic policies to mitigate it; (the—specific and general—unsuitability of) Universal Basic Income; sustainability of fiscal debt and pensions; personal finance, in the crisis and beyond, etc.
• Adevarul, 6 May 2020 (saved PDF on my website), in Romanian (see also a short description on twitter): the third and last of the separately published parts of my ample interview about the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and measures to save/ restart the economy (interviewer: Remus Florescu) given on April 13 2020, this chapter was entitled “The EU coronabonds would be one of the most efficient instrument of the UE to fight the pandemic crisis; Germany’s attitude in that respect not only egoistic, but puerile” (translation of the original title in RO).  Inter alia, I tackled in this bit of the interview the largely unjustified “inflation phobia” (particularly great among decision makers in Romania); the necessity of rethinking globalization, in particular with accent on the strategic value chains (something that the Covid-19 pandemic highlighted very clearly) and on compensating those negatively affected (something clear since ever, but never properly addressed); and the expected, but so far little materialized, leader role of the European Union in this crisis (in many ways this being a test for the solidarity the EU was projected to stand for, and which Jean Monnet had so clearly and unequivocally emphasized). This interview part was actually published so much later than the date of the interview per se (13 April), to be closer to the Europe Day on May 9 (unfortunately, just days before, the German constitutional court managed to give another blow to what European solidarity ought to mean, in any language…).
• Revista Sinteza, 4 May 2020 (saved PDF on my website), in Romanian (see also short twitter description ), long and wide-range interview (interviewer: Ruxandra Hurezean) entitled: “A big advantage of the current pandemic crisis is that it is not structural” (translated from RO).  Among other things I discussed my impression of Paris under the pandemic; asymmetric effects of the pandemic crisis—including the amplification of the existing social inequality, in several dimensions; how to think of (modern times) fiscal deficits in general, and under the current crisis; will there be a food crisis linked to this pandemic crisis and how can we think to manage that, if so; what are the necessary steps to relax the confinement/ social distancing measures so far, and what are the currently proposed solutions/ plans ahead to restart the heavily hit economies. The interested reader can also deepen his/her perspective by consulting the further references I offered in this interview.
• Adevarul, 28 April 2020 (saved PDF on my website), in Romanian (see a short twitter description, also in RO): a second published out of three successive parts of an ample interview (interviewer: Remus Florescu) given on April 13,  entitled “The lesson of the previous pandemics: the social distancing/ pandemic containment measures are justified both medically and economically” (paraphrased from the tile in original Ro); this part is about what we know (and what sometimes we ignored) from the study of previous pandemics, a general discussion about the mechanisms through which the pandemic crisis affects the economy, and the policy measures most economists currently agree on to alleviate the negative shocks, and to restart the economy once that is possible. I also gave plenty of further references for details/ specifics regarding most of my arguments put forward in this interview.
• Adevarul, 26 April 2020 (with saved PDF on my website), in Romanian (see also a short description on twitter also in RO): the first of three separately published parts of an ample interview (interviewer: Remus Florescu) that I had given on April 13 (chronologically, this was the *third* part of the interview…)—  entitled “Forget about the 60% public debt rule or the 3% fiscal deficit rule: when Covid-19 knocks at your door, these do no matter any longer” (translated from the original title in Romanian), this is essentially about (some of) the economic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic inside Romania, with discussion of the policy measures taken up to that date by the RO government, and that in comparison with what other European states (including Romania’s Eastern/ Central EU neighbors) had done. In particular, I mentioned the many misunderstandings of the RO government in power (a clique with close to zero competence in economic policy, and a merry-go-round group of ‘advisers’ who proudly describe themselves as Austrian economists—though fail to understand even what that niche entails), resulting in a chaotic (euphemism) management of the crisis so far, on the background of already very bad management of the country prior to the crisis, in several respects. Luckily, at least the social distancing measures were taken relatively early in the crisis.
• Stirile ProTV, 19 April 2018 (includes video material)—with saved PDF version of its transcription—realized by Cosmin Savu: “Evaluarea unuia dintre cei mai importanţi economişti români: “Suntem pe la jumătatea Africii”“. This is a more detailed continuation/ expansion of the interview bits included in the Romanian national ProTV- “Romania, Te Iubesc!” program’s “Economie, Caut Strategie” edition from a few days earlier (see the bullet point below), with further excellent discussion points raised by my interlocutor Cosmin Savu; inter alia, we briefly covered the dismal state of the scientific research in Economics in Romania, the role/ reception of the ERMAS academic conferences in Economics, the (pervasive lack of) academic integrity in Romania, the under- or badly- utilised resources in academe—and in the economy more generally, the general incompetence and/ or special interests aiming the capture of rents rather than improving productivity/ welfare, etc.  The transcribed material was also covered/ adapted/ summarized subsequently by other media, e.g.:  monitorul.com.ro, bzk.ro, portal-ro.com,  stiriziare.com, xgc.ro, etc.
• “Romania, Te Iubesc!” at Stirile ProTV, 15 April 2018 (45 min video material), by Cosmin Savu: “Economie, Caut Strategie!”. Together with others (academics, politicians, managers, workers, etc.), I was interviewed for this superlative edition of the well-known, popular investigative program “Romania, Te Iubesc”, of the national Romanian TV channel Pro TV, this time interpreting/ discussing the overall state of the Romanian economy, with focus on the sheer incompetence and general lack of any viable strategy/ vision at governmental level (since 1989 and until today…), and that despite a few success stories at the level of some industries or particular companies. You can watch my interventions in the video linked above from minutes 31 and respectively 41 or, separately structured within the (partly transcribed) third part of that program—saved PDF version of that transcript; you can also see a couple of separate photos from that video-interview (NB. the youtube version linked here does not appear to work any longer; see instead the main link to the entire 45 min program, from above). This 3rd section of the program, mainly tackling the loss of the country’s qualified human capital, was subsequently covered/ adapted/ summarized also by, among others, extranews.ro, bzk.ro, informateca.ro, reporterromania.ro, or stiriactuale.ro. The “Economie, Caut Strategie” edition of ProTV’s “Romania, Te Iubesc” program was number 1 in the overall TV audience top, of that day.
• Hotnews, 10 April 2018 – saved PDF version – by Dan Popa: “Sebastian Buhai, cercetator roman in Stockholm, ridica o intrebare simpla: e normal ca un laureat Nobel sa nu poata trece de criteriile impuse de autoritatile universitare romanesti pentru a preda la noi? De ce suntem la pamant cu cercetarea economica?“. This is a very good (and very swift!) sum-up for the popular national news site Hotnews of the second part of a talk I gave at the Bucharest University of Economic Studies (Academia de Stiinte Economice Bucuresti, in Romanian), about the truly parallel (i.e. parallel not only to excellence and merit, but even decency…) universe in which Romanian research in Economics finds itself, a consequence of the (dis)incentives implemented at the national level by those who do not have any interest for it to prosper. Partly based on two reports by myself and others: Buhai et al (2016) and respectively Buhai, Litan and Silaghi (2015) – see also the links to the press materials immediately below for other coverage of those-  and an intensive mini-course I gave at the Advanced Institute for Science and Technology of Babes-Bolyai University (UBB-STAR) in Cluj, Nov 2017, the Hotnews material was also covered/ adapted/ summarized by Romania24.net, TheWorldNews.net, StiriZiare.com, ZiareLive.ro, etc.
• Piata Financiara, 28 February 2018 – saved PDF version – by Moise Norel (see also the cover of that edition): “Cercetarea economica romaneasca ne plaseaza la jumatatea nivelului Africii” , an interview (within an excellent series of interviews on the Romanian Econ academe initiated by Moise Norel: see a couple of those within the “leadership” category of Piata Financiara) on the absurd state of domestic Romanian research and education in Economics (to a large extent based on this report/ manifesto by Buhai et al, 2016), and on attitude and aptitude (or rather: lack of those…) in managing/ organizing scientific research and higher level education in Romania, more generally (see also a grouping of several press interviews with me on that same topic, on my blog). In the end of that interview I also offered my very brief (in-a-tweet!) recipe for what I think my country needs in terms of a viable academe, economy, and society.
• Actual de Cluj, 15 August 2017—saved PDF version—by Kristina Restea: “Din grupul economiştilor care au declarat război imposturii în mediul academic din Romania, tara unde premianţi de Nobel nu au loc în Universităţi. Sebastian Buhai, cercetător român la Stockholm: “Vorbim de o lume paralelă, asta e şocant!””. This interview with excellent questions by journalist Kristina Restea takes on, inter alia, expected eventual changes in the Romanian academic system following our Buhai et al (2016) report and manifesto: “The Rise for Academic Integrity in Romanian (Domestic) Economic Sciences” (see also the 4 Dec 2016 entry on my “essays” page for further details; for other extensive coverage in the Romanian mass-media about that report please see below on this “media coverage” page the entries dated 14 Dec 2016 and 6 dec 2016); the Actual de Cluj article was also taken over, in various formats, by, among others, InsideCluj.ro, Romania24.net, CentruldePresa.ro, PortalZiare.ro, I-ziare.ro, Index-stiri.ro, etc. Unfortunately, despite the extensive media coverage and the thumbs up from many academics (economists and beyond) inside and outside Romania, Romanian decision-makers in context did not do almost anything to address and correct the absurdities (inter alia, “academic prostitution” is but an euphemism to picture what is asked from our economist colleagues inside Romania to be successful and to promote within the current system) that we pointed out in that report (as well as in reports from previous years, e.g., this one…). Surely then, the show *must* go on and, hopefully, many more will join in our (velvet) revolution!
• Live 30-min interview on Look TV—the “Casa Poporului” program hosted by Ciprian Aron, 1 August 2017, about the persistent, ubiquitous, to-many-unbelievable-but-sadly-real problems of the Romanian university/ academic system concerning Economic Sciences (and not only), and about initiatives meant to help, such as, e.g., the ERMAS annual conferences, etc. No link online appears to be available, but see some pics.
• Actual de Cluj, 26 July 2017, by Kristina Restea: “Ce fac economiştii din diaspora în ţara unde laureaţii de Nobel nu au loc în universităţi“, about the ERMAS (2017) conference and its contribution to bringing back to life Economic Sciences in Romania; taken over, under various formats, also by Hotnews.ro, Fluierul.ro, Roportal.ro, Instrainatate.ro, etc.
• Adevarul, 24 April 2017, by Remus Florescu, “„Marşul pentru Ştiinţă” în ţara în care se fac analize economice bazate pe numerologie. Cum poate fi România „reparat㔓—with expanded comments about this Romanian ‘march for science” also on my blog.
• Comments/ consultation for various articles published in the national newspaper “Romania Libera” or by the Romanian Center for Investigative Journalism (CRJI), January-November 2017, mostly by the investigative journalist Sorin Semeniuc, about cases of plagiarism and other violations of academic ethic among Romanian dignitaries: Isarescu: 23 Jan 2017 and 25 Jan 2017 ;  Tranca & Matei: 31 Jan 2017; Grindeanu: 3 Feb 2017; the “doctorate factories” inside several Romanian ‘academies’: 21 Mar 2017; Serban Nicolae I: 21 May 2017  (on the same topic, see also Starea Natiei,  16 May 2017, from min 10); Tudose: 4 Jul 2017; Enache: 30 Aug 2017; Serban Nicolae II: 22 Nov 2017, CRJI.
• Adevarul, 14 December 2016—saved PDF version—by Remus Florescu, “Cercetarea economică din România, sub cea a ţărilor africane. Revoluţia „de carton“ a CNATDCU: „poţi în continuare candida cu lucrări în hernie abdominală“”. If the previous bullet point (6 Dec 2016 entry) tackled coverage of Buhai et al (2016)‘s main findings (see also my essays page, 4 Dec 2016 entry), this interview focuses on what was achieved through the national CNATDCU-ECON’s newly voted criteria (on 5 Dec), subsequently signed into law by the then-Minister of Education & Research (on 20 Dec). Short answer: almost nothing (even this tiny, malformed, redundant ε is likely to die young, given the new RO Gov and particularly—ironically from the perspective of our study—the new educator-and-researcher-in-chief). Florescu’s article has also been distributed by, e.g., Antena.ro, Baleares.ro, Fluierul.ro, Ziare.com, ZiaruldeIasi, Portal-ro.com, Infoziare.ro, etc. Despite media exposure and vehement scientist reactions—many public or directly sent to CNATDCU—the pseudo-scientific, incumbent Econ nomenclature has again chosen to sacrifice academic decency, at the expense of the RO Econs’ long-term well-being, and of the RO academe’s/ society’s welfare more generally. The saddest is that utter failure affected even decision-making technocrats expected to fully grasp our study’s implications (after all already obvious from my mediatised earlier study—see below); this was ex post reconfirmed, e.g., by an amazingly bad (albeit some ok parts) interview with M. Andruh, CNATDCU head and, unlike others therein, a qualified scientist (fast reactions here, here, here, or here). What now?… Do not forget, do not forgive, relentlessly pursue (the Romanian dream of) academic integrity & scientific performance: we shall overcome!
  
• PressOne, 6 December 2016—with saved PDF version—article by Bianca Felseghi, entitled “Laureații Nobelului pentru Economie nu întrunesc criteriile pentru a fi profesori în România”. This is a good commentary in Romanian—including additional answers I gave to the journalist—of some of the main aspects of a paper written in English by myself and eight others, Buhai et al (2016): “The Rise for Academic Integrity in Romanian (Domestic) Economic Sciences”; see my “essays page” the 4 Dec 2016 entry, for details. In a nutshell, RO Econ Sciences are, in terms of quality-adjusted research output, at 1/2 of Africa’s (!) level, while criteria for evaluating performance therein are out of touch with sanity, s.t. even Econ Nobel Laureates would not minimally qualify for professorships: we call for a rise against the regime which enacted & continues to defend this imbecilic state of affairs. Felseghi’s PressOne commentary of our study was subsequently featured in a comedy show by Europa FM, a national radio broadcaster, as well as summarized/ distributed by other media outlets, such as Money.ro, Cultural.bzi.ro, Antena3.ro, Ziare-pe-net.ro, Ziarelive.ro, personal blogs, etc. Some public reactions from foreign/RO scientists have been collected as “retweets” on twitter EconAcademia (Dec 2016).
  
• Adevarul, 23 September 2016—with saved PDF version—by Remus Florescu: “Cercetător român la Universitatea din Stockholm, despre învăţământul din ţară: „În România, un doctor în economie nu mai înseamnă, din păcate, nimic“”. This is the 2nd part of an interview in Adevarul on the implications of Buhai, Litan and Silaghi (2015): “Disincentiving the performance: the case of the Romanian national criteria in Economic Sciences” (English abstract), now specifically about wider, societal consequences, and about what was done, and what to do about the truly inane status quo in RO domestic Economic Sciences; see the bullet point entry for 19 August 2016 below for the 1st part of this interview. This Adevarul article was disseminated also through Antena.ro, Gazetarul.ro, Nmedia.ro, ZiaruldeIasi, Roportal.ro, ZiareLive.ro, Ziare.com, etc. Read also an overview on my blog: “Despre universuri paralele in evaluarea performantei in cercetarea economica”, with reader comments covering both interview parts from Adevarul.
  
• Romanian Center for Investigative Journalism (CRJI), 12 September 2016, by Sorin Semeniuc—saved PDF version—on the plagiarism of “academic experts” (here, one of many losers w/out any expertise from the national decision-making CNATDCU body) appointed to assess alledged plagiarism by other ‘wannabe academics’ (here, a hapless former RO Minister of Internal Affairs), ubiquitous in my country… I am quoted in a paragraph at the end of this article stating that plagiarism in RO is the tip of the iceberg (RO journalists care only about plagiarism), the problems of academic misevaluation, awarding of titles and perks, and promotion/proliferation of pseudo-values being widespread and more important for both academe and society—as I & co-authors have shown for Economics (see my ‘essays page’ or relevant bullet points on this page).  This gets eventually back to who is to set standards, who is to evaluate “evaluators”? My sine qua non is that any “evaluators”, any decision-makers such as CNATDCU members, have to be *internationally* acknowleged as relevant in the academic profession, and w/o the slightest trace of ethics violation. The CRJI article was covered also by 7est.ro, Nasul.tv, ReporterIS.ro, ZiareLive.ro, etc.
  
• Digi 24 TV: “Starea Natiei”, 31 August 2016, minutes 39-43: no less than 4 min allocated on a popular national Romanian TV comedy show hosted by Dragos Patraru, to the subject of  ERMAS, disincentiving scientific performance, and the Romanian Rahova Institute of Technology. For foreigners: get someone to translate that clip for you, since it scores reasonably high on the fun scale (albeit with tragic nuances for RO Econ academics, and eventually for the RO society). This was again popularising some of the findings by Buhai, Litan and Silaghi (2015)—see also the previous bullet point.
  
• Adevarul, 19 August 2016—with saved PDF version—by Remus Florescu, in Romanian, entitled “Economistul genial considerat „şansa României la Nobel”, profesor la Oxford şi la Sorbona, nu e suficient de bun şi pentru a preda la o universitate din ţară” (the journalist’s title might appear exaggerated, but is meant to capture the paradox as vividly as possible…). This is a press material commenting the Buhai, Litan and Silaghi (2015) study—see also my ‘essays page’ for the entry dated December 2015—about the absurd, fully inane national criteria of evaluation/promotion in Romanian domestic Economic Sciences, embodying a universe parallel to both scientific excellence and academic mere decency, given international standards for this field; it contains further interview QAs. This was further disseminated under various formats (summary, commentary) by other outlets, including B1.ro, Business24.r0, Wall-Street.ro, Alternativenews.ro, StirileKanalD.ro, Antena.ro, Realitatea.net, Gazetarul.ro, ZiaruldeIasi, Ziare.com, Sputnik.md, 9am.ro, etc. The ERMAS 2016 conference press coverage also contains selected links. Read also the corresponding post on my blog: “Despre universuri paralele…”, with reader comments and reactions.
  
• Adevarul, 18 April 2016, with its saved PDF  version, an article by Petre Munteanu entitled “100 FP Romania/ 2015:- what was relevant in terms of Ideas & Projects: academicians, historians, politologues, psihologists, economists, entrepreneurs” (RO: “100 FP Romania/ 2015- ce a fost relevant in materie de Idei & Proiecte: academicieni, istorici, politologi, psihologi, economisti, antreprenori”), with info on the new FP Romania Laureates “Top 100: People and Ideas which Move Romania”—category Ideas/Projects, including my own listing there; the bullet point below has more details.
  
• Foreign Policy Romania, nr. 50, ed. Feb/March 2016, available fully only in print, in Romanian; see the relevant page scan (see also the category screenshot from the FP Romania Top 100 Prize Gala in March 2016); an article with detailed information about all the 2016 FP Romania Laureates “Top 100: People and Ideas which Move Romania”, including my own listing there under the category “Ideas/ Projects”, and the entry “Sebastian Buhai, economist: For the Insistence to Align Economics Research in Romania to International Standards ”  (in original: “Sebastian Buhai, economist: Pentru Insistenta de a Alinia Cercetarea Economica din Romania la Standarde Internationale”). More specifically, I was listed in this FP Romania top 100 for a proposal that the Romanian National Bank (BNR) starts a Romanian Institute for Economics and Finance (“Institutul Roman pentru Economie si Finante”=IREF), analogous to the Bank of Italy-initiated EIEF and respectively the Bank of Spain-initiated CEMFI.  This was my 2nd consecutive listing in the Foreign Policy Romania Top 100, in the previous year being listed, together with 3 colleagues, in the same “Ideas/ Projects” category—and then actually winning the category’s prize—for initiating the ERMAS conference (see corresponding links below).
  
• Adevarul, 14 December 2015, by Remus Florescu, in Romanian, with the title “De ce esueaza reformele Educatiei: spiritul de turma si centralizarea puterii. Trasaturile lumii academice romane incompatibile cu modelele occidentale”, summarizing conclusions of the 2015 Report of the G3A Think Tank on Romanian academic/research policies, where I and two co-authors contributed an analysis on the dismal situation of Economic Sciences within Romania (read the abstract in English, entitled “Disincentivizing the performance: the case of the Romanian national criteria for evaluating research in Economic Sciences”)
  
• Press release of the National Bank of Romania (BNR), 5 October 2015: the BNR Governor’s speech in a ceremony rewarding BNR researchers admitted to present papers at the Annual Conferences of Romanian Academic Economists from Abroad (ERMAS), which I together with 3 colleagues initiated in summer 2014 (see further links below for various prizes/articles related to this conference).
  
• Live 50-minute interview/ discussion on the Romanian TV channel Digi24 (Cluj-Napoca), “Vocile Clujului” rubric, with Marius Benta as — superlative — moderator, 28 July 2015. If easier to access, now you can also see this interview on YouTube. In this talk-show, entitled “Economist din diaspora: Cercetarea de top este posibilă în Romania”, I have discussed some of the steps that need to be taken in Romania in order to eventually reach excellence in terms of scientific research and graduate education status quo, with focus on Economic Sciences (arguably, Economics has one of the sorriest state among all sciences represented in my country). Inter alia, my advice for my co-nationals was to plagiarize… yes, to plagiarize!… but with a twist: they need to stop- and punish properly- plagiarizing scientific papers or PhD theses as currently habitual even at governmental levels in Romania, and instead copy/plagiarize/emulate the organization/management of scientific research and graduate education from e.g., US, UK, Western Continental EU. The large and reasonably successful community of Romanian academic economists from the diaspora is ready to help, but our colleagues from within Romania have to be prepared to listen carefully and act… before further generations are lost. To read comments subsequent to that talk-show see my corresponding blogpost.
• Adevarul, 17 June 2015 (with saved PDF version), in Romanian: under the (translated from Romanian) title “A Romanian economist from the diaspora challenges Mugur Isarescu [Governor of the National Bank of Romania=BNR hereinafter]: BNR should capitalize on the top Romanian economists from outside the country“, this is Remus Florescu’s well adapted version of an article I initially wrote for Blog EconAcademia (blog of Romanian academic economists that I initiated and co-founded in December 2014), proposing that BNR sets up a research institute in Economics similar to the Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance (EIEF) from Rome (founded by the Bank of Italy), revolutionizing the current, dismal status quo of the research and graduate education in Economics from inside Romania. The Adevarul article has been taken over by other online (news) sites, such as Gazetarul.ro, Comisarul.ro, RadioIntact.ro, Fluierul.ro, Ziare.ro, etc.
• “Sinteza- Revista de gandire si cultura strategica”, number 15, April 2015, in Romanian (available fully only in print; see imperfect fast-scanned version): adapted interview with me by Elena Nicolae, nicely entitled (by her) “The voice of the eXported Generation” (in original “Vocea generatiei eXportate“). I discussed briefly and generally about the Romanian ‘Generation X’ and how I fit in that, including my impression of Romania under Communism, the Romanian December ’89 revolution, my experience of studying/working outside Romania from very early on, etc.
• Adevarul, 4 March 2015 and Adevarul, 6 April 2015 (with saved PDF versions, pdf_4March2015 and respectively pdf_6April2016), in Romanian: 2 articles by Petru Munteanu with the list/description of the 2015 Foreign Policy (FP) Romania Prizes “Top 100: People and Ideas which Move Romania” (=”Top 100: Oameni si Idei care Misca Romania”); I have been awarded the 2015 FP Romania “Top 100” Prize– jointly with Mihai Copaciu, Cosmin Ilut and Cristian Litan– within the category “Ideas/Projects” (=”Idei/Proiecte”), for our initiating the Annual Conferences of Romanian Academic Economists from Abroad (“ERMAS” as Romanian acronym). The more recent article linked here is an ‘extended version’ of all those listed within the “Ideas/Projects” category of the 2015 FP Romania Top 100; starts with my colleague Mihai Copaciu’s photo receiving the category prize on our behalf, in Bucharest, 3 March 2015.
• Foreign Policy Romania, nr. 44, ed. Feb/March 2015 (available only in print; a relevant PDF fragment), in Romanian: an article with detailed information about the 2015 FP Romania Prizes “Top 100: People and Ideas which Move Romania”, including the prize that I and 3 other colleagues have won for initiating the ERMAS conference, within the category “Ideas/Projects”, see also the bullet point immediately above. This article was mentioned, inter alia, also in a press communiqué of FSEGA, Babes-Bolyai University, superlative hosts of the very first ERMAS edition (you can also check out a compilation of various news media about the 1st ERMAS conference edition, including on this FP Romania Top 100 prize).
  
• Adevarul, 1 January 2015 (with saved PDF version), in Romanian: interview in this newspaper’s cycle “Romani cu care ne mandrim” (=”Romanians who make us proud”), published in the very first day of the new year(!), in which I answered questions about my recent initiatives concerning Romanian academic economists, about my best research published in 2014, and offered my New Year wishes for Romania.
• Adevarul, 12 November 2014 (with a saved PDF version, in case the link stops working), in Romanian. An article by Remus Florescu, slightly adapting my questions on science/ research/ education policy addressed to the Romanian presidential candidates from the 2nd election round, November 2014 (this article gathered more than 1800 “likes” online on the Adevarul website, after just 1 (one) day since publication). The initial material embedding these questions appeared on my blog (where you can also read comments and my reactions to them). These 2014 questions are, in fact, identical to the ones I have addressed to the then-ROpresidential candidates a decade earlier, in Nov 2004 (e.g., see below on this media-coverage page, around November 2004; search also my essays page for documents from around that date), when they were also sustained by several associations of Romanian researchers, and individually by some of the top Romanian scientists from abroad, including the Romanian Nobel Prize winner George Emil Palade; then, in 2004 (as, sadly, now in 2014) few of the presidential candidates bothered to answer anything (and none replied concretely and/or to the point; for some of those 2004 documents, candidate replies, etc, consult a sum-up by the Ad Astra Association of Romanian Scientists), and, unexpectedly, nothing significant changed in terms of science or education policy in my country, which still performs below any other EU countries and way below its potential. This article from Adevarul appeared also on Yahoo News Romania or Comisarul de Cluj.
• Foreign Policy Romania (FPR), October-November 2014 edition– appeared in print 6 october– (so far only in print; in Romanian). The print edition has my short bio (with some errors, e.g., missing again one of my university degrees, but overall fine) on page 8- glimpse here– and an interview, taken by Raluca Maxim, on pages 40-41, entitled “Repatriere stiintifica. La ce pot fi buni acasa economistii romani validati in centre de cercetare majore din lume” , glimpse here. See also the index of topics from this FPR edition.
• ‘Sinteza- Revista de gandire si cultura strategica’, number 8, September 2014 edition (only in print; in Romanian), ample material by Elena Nicolae in the ‘Intelligent Business’ section– under my headline “Noi nu ne-am saturat de Romania” (which appeared also in one of my interviews mentioned below on this page, about 10 years earlier)– covering the ERMAS 2014 conference, based on interviews with myself, Mihai Copaciu, Cristian Pop-Eleches, Nicolae Garleanu, Virgiliu Midrigan and Mihai Manea. A glimpse of this Sinteza material (Sinteza’s journalists took pretty nice pictures!).
• VoxPublica.Realitatea.net, 22 August 2014 (in Romanian) , an article-analysis by Ciprian Domnisoru.
• Adevarul, 21 August 2014 (in Romanian) This material from Adevarul was also taken over by Yahoo News Romania.
• Adevarul, 20 August 2014 (in Romanian) . (Flattering) Article by Remus Florescu (from its very title: “Mintile sclipitoare ale Romaniei care schimba economia lumii. De ce nu s-ar intoarce acasa”), based on interviews with myself, Mihai Manea and Nicolae Bogdan Garleanu (NB: the article has got some relatively minor errors — such as missing one of my academic education degrees, etc.– but overall is written well and obviously with noble intentions :-)). This article also appeared and/or was mentioned/ adapted on Wall-Street.ro, Comisarul.ro, Romania20.org or Momentozero.eu.
• Actual de Cluj, 19 August 2014 (in Romanian)
• Digi24 Cluj-Napoca, 18 August 2014 (in Romanian), with short video interview about the ERMAS 2014 conference (following after Mugur Isarescu and Cristian Pop-Eleches in the linked videoclip). The content of the article appeared also on Yahoo News Romania.
• Hotnews, 14 August 2014 (in Romanian)
• Live 50-min dialogue on Romanian TV channel Digi 24 Cluj, 23 July 2014, together with Cristian Litan, and Marius Benta from Digi. If easier to access, now you can also watch this discussion on YouTube. The talk show was about ERMAS 2014 (18-22 August, Cluj-Napoca, Romania), i.e., the first edition of the Annual Scientific Conference of Romanian Academic Economists (“Conferinta Stiintifica Anuala a Economistilor Romani din Mediul Academic din Strainatate” in Romanian), which I have initiated and co-coordinated, including about its objectives, participants, near and far future, and related discussions about the Romanian scientific research, etc. All materials about the conference can be consulted on conferinta.econacademia.net (look for the PDF documents, available usually in both Romanian and English). These documents are also be accessible from my webpage with miscellaneous (non-research) essays.
• Live 50-min discussion on Romanian TV channel Digi24 (Cluj-Napoca), rubric “Vocile Clujului”, together with Marius Benta and Razvan Florian, 3 April 2014. If easier to access, now you can also watch this dialogue on YouTube. Inter alia, Razvan and I discussed about the current status of research and research policy in Romania, concrete ideas/ chances of bringing back or collaborating with the best Romanian scientists abroad, my involvement with the 1st Annual Scientific Conference of Romanian Academic Economists from Abroad (ERMAS 2014), and even… Salvo Montalbano, in the Romanian academic context :-). For some background in these discussions you may also want to read this essay on the condition of the Romanian scientific researcher that I wrote in 2004, or this other essay with questions addressed to the Romanian presidential candidates also in 2004, both mentioned in my Digi 24 interview (more such materials can be consulted here). And, of course, not sufficiently discussed in this interview, feel free to browse my and some of my enthusiastic Romanian economist colleagues’ initiative, Econacademia.
• Contributors.ro, 18 December 2013 (in Romanian) , article by Virgil Iordache.
• Tinbergen Institute Magazine #27, Fall 2013 (in English) See page 8 of this PDF.
• Hotnews.ro, 18 February 2013 (in Romanian) With the program of this RUSMG (the best I could do at the time in terms of a general name/ acronym :-)) workshop (in English)
• Romanian Embassy in Denmark website, 6 October 2012 (in Romanian) See also the full YouTube video record of the 6-10-12 BRAINetwork event that was mentioned in this article (my address starts about 33m30s – in Romanian; the subtitles in English are mostly fine, but not always correct).
• EVENTUALLY UNPUBLISHED 10-question interview in Romania Libera (the journalist who wanted to interview me, Petre Badica, seemingly changed his mind after I sent him– true, rather late: the excuse is that we have also other things to do in academia– the answers), 10 February 2012 (in Romanian)
• Live 40-min dialog on Romanian TV channel TransilvaniaLive.ro (former NCN.Ro), within the “Ziua de Zece” rubric (with Marius Benta and Sabin Gherman), 22 December 2011: I could not retrieve this online yet, will post a link here once I do. I discussed, inter alia, about the European Union labour market and Romania in this context, including labour market restrictions still kept by some of the EU Member States, North-South labour market differences in the EU etc. (in Romanian)
• Live interview on Romanian TV channel NCN.ro, within the “Cluj Zi de Zi” rubric (Ciprian Aron interviewer), 2 September 2010 (in Romanian): link1, link2 (my interview is the last of that day, starts about 94’30”). The interview was mainly about the status of the Romanian education and scientific research (e.g., recent education reforms of the Education Minister, Daniel Funeriu etc.), comparison to other European systems and to the USA etc. (in Romanian)
• Flacara, 20 January, 2009 (in Romanian)
• Cotidianul, 20 Aprilie, 2008 (in Romanian)
• Noua revista Cultura, 9 March 2006 (in Romanian)
• Internal University Press, Aarhus School of Business, 23 February 2006 (in Danish)
• Cotidianul, 26 October 2005 (in Romanian) (see also a note from the “Catavencu Media Group” about this )
• Timpul, 5 May 2005 (in Romanian)
• Ev. Zilei interview with then-Ad-Astra director Razvan Florian, 23 November 2004 (in Romanian)
• Forumul Academic Roman, comunicat de presa, 22 November 2004 (in Romanian)
• Ziua, 19 November 2004 (in Romanian)
• Cultura, November 2004 (in Romanian)
• Romanian Global News, 16 November 2004 (in Romanian)
• Romanian Global News, 3 November 2004 (in Romanian)
• Adevarul, 19 October 2004 (in Romanian)
• Elsevier, October 2004 (in Dutch)
• NRC, 2 April 1999 (in Dutch)

Some of Sebastian Buhai’s Other Projects and Links

See also a bunch of random links from my older website, which I should (re)organize as soon as possible… or not.

Herein below you can read/ access my latest posts from the BlueSky and Twitter (X) platforms (the custom Twitter (X) feed updates with a substantial lag and sometimes chaotically). You are obviously better off reading/ following me directly on Twitter (X) and/or on Mastodon and/or on BlueSky and/or on Threads for full functionality. (NB. The latter three platform feeds, unlike Twitter (X), are readable also if not logged in on the corresponding platform.)

Retweet on Twitter Sebastian Buhai Retweeted

; Equipe France @EquipeFRA ·

1 Nov 1852317684324606282

⏱️ 1.48.88
Léon Marchand pulvérise le record du monde du 200m 4 nages (petit bassin) 🚀

Twitter feed video.

Reply on Twitter 1852317684324606282 Retweet on Twitter 1852317684324606282 62 Like on Twitter 1852317684324606282 371

Retweet on Twitter Sebastian Buhai Retweeted

; World Aquatics @WorldAquatics ·

1 Nov 1852311980473790621

🚨WOOOORLD RECORD🚨
🇫🇷 Leon Marchand breaks Ryan Lochte WR from 2012 with an incredible swim in the 200m IM (25m) #SWC2024 #FASTLANE #UNITEDBYRACING

Twitter feed image.

Reply on Twitter 1852311980473790621 Retweet on Twitter 1852311980473790621 67 Like on Twitter 1852311980473790621 233

Retweet on Twitter Sebastian Buhai Retweeted

; francetvsport @francetvsport ·

1 Nov 1852311490923000167

🏊 #SWC2024 | 🤯 RECORD DU MONDE POUR LÉON MARCHAND !

💪 Le Français pulvérise le record du monde sur 200m 4 nages à Singapour, MAIS QUI VA L'ARRÊTER ?

📺 Suivez le direct : http://bit.ly/Natation-Shanghai

Twitter feed video.

Reply on Twitter 1852311490923000167 Retweet on Twitter 1852311490923000167 163 Like on Twitter 1852311490923000167 581

Retweet on Twitter Sebastian Buhai Retweeted

; jon batiste @JonBatiste ·

1 Nov 1852233104808616340

https://jon-batiste.lnk.to/BeethovenBlues

This music could heal the world!!!!! . If we could all come together the way this music comes together, notes and tones in harmony, no bias, celebrating our differences and co-creating in service of the greater good. What if Beethoven was from the Congo?…

Twitter feed video.

Reply on Twitter 1852233104808616340 Retweet on Twitter 1852233104808616340 67 Like on Twitter 1852233104808616340 336

; Sebastian Buhai @sbuhai ·

31 Oct 1852131112589427101

And that was Halloween 2024 in Paris!

Twitter feed video.

Twitter feed image.

Twitter feed image.

Twitter feed video.

Reply on Twitter 1852131112589427101 Retweet on Twitter 1852131112589427101 6 Like on Twitter 1852131112589427101 24

; Sebastian Buhai @sbuhai ·

31 Oct 1851980352870343145

Despre transmiterea intergeneratională a talentului de plagiator (sau ilustrarea politic-neaoșă a proverbului "așchia nu sare departe de trunchi"):

P.S. 'Of, of, of..., măi, animalule..., măcar de-ar fi copiat pe unii mai acătării, prostănac[a,ul] tatii!'

Fata lui Geoană a copiat discursul nepoatei lui Trump. Cum arată, față în față - HotNews.ro

Jurnalistul Patrick Andre de Hillerin, de la „Cațavencii" a remarcat că marți, la Antena 3, Ana Geoană a ți...

hotnews.ro

Reply on Twitter 1851980352870343145 Retweet on Twitter 1851980352870343145 0 Like on Twitter 1851980352870343145 5

; Sebastian Buhai @sbuhai ·

30 Oct 1851731864794394777

Un an mai târziu (https://x.com/sbuhai/status/1719476624578449819), 𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑔𝑛𝑒 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑧𝑎, 𝑣𝑜𝑖 𝑐ℎ𝑒... 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒.

Twitter feed image.

Reply on Twitter 1851731864794394777 Retweet on Twitter 1851731864794394777 5 Like on Twitter 1851731864794394777 11

; Sebastian Buhai @sbuhai ·

29 Oct 1851353147672866886

Our home gourmet dinner tonight: Caviar & Condrieu

Caviar from "Danube Caviar: "Almas", "Imperial Osetra", "Royal Beluga" (https://danubecaviar.com in RO: inter alia also Bruno Verjus's "Table" suppliers here in Paris)
Condrieu from "Corps de Loup", 2022 (https://www.corpsdeloup.com/fr/nos-vins)

Twitter feed image.

Reply on Twitter 1851353147672866886 Retweet on Twitter 1851353147672866886 0 Like on Twitter 1851353147672866886 8

Retweet on Twitter Sebastian Buhai Retweeted

; The Review of Economic Studies @RevEconStudies ·

28 Oct 1851017341208826113

Recently accepted to REStud, ``Markups and Inequality," from Boar and Midrigan:

https://www.restud.com/markups-and-inequality/

Twitter feed image.

Reply on Twitter 1851017341208826113 Retweet on Twitter 1851017341208826113 32 Like on Twitter 1851017341208826113 188

Load More